Essential reading for retailers and suppliers in the home improvement market

VictoriaPlum.com wins trademark infringement case against competitor

Published: 18 November 2016 - Jenny Wonnacott

Online retailer VictoriaPlum.com has succeeded in legal proceedings against competitor Victorian Plumbing for infringement of trademark in a ruling from the High Court released today.

The high court in London heard how Victoria Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when customers had typed in Victoria Plum
The high court in London heard how Victoria Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when customers had typed in Victoria Plum

Victorian Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when consumers had searched for the Victoria Plum brand name and related terms. The court ruled that Victorian Plumbing was spending “hundreds of thousands of pounds per annum” on adverts that have been found liable for trademark infringement.

VictoriaPlum.com, which started trading in 2001, says it will now seek damages from Victorian Plumbing for the losses caused by the unlawful infringements. During the hearing the court heard from VictoriaPlum.com founder Jason Walker and Mark Radcliffe, managing director of Victorian Plumbing. VictoriaPlum.com’s case was supported by expert evidence from a leading industry expert. The week long court hearing took place at the High Court in London in October this year.

VictoriaPlum.com's chief executive officer Paul McClenaghan welcomed the ruling, saying, “We know our potential customers are over 20 times more likely to know the VictoriaPlum.com brand than that of Victorian Plumbing. The court found that Victorian Plumbing acted unlawfully, infringed our trademarks and was increasing and exacerbating confusion for customers.

"We were left with no option but to take legal action against Victorian Plumbing to protect our customers and we are pleased that our concerns have been vindicated.  We will now seek substantial damages from Victorian Plumbing through continued legal action.”

Comments


(Your email address will not be published)
Already Registered?
Sign In
Not Yet Registered?
Register
Printable View E-mail Bookmark
*

What do you think?


Should online distributors and re-sellers of lighting products who are based outside the UK be held accountable and made to comply with product testing and WEEE regulations?


Latest reader comments

re: Retailers urged to be wary of counterfeit goods on Black Friday

Dino NicK
The only reliable way to STOP the fakes market is by serializing the original goods and offer the possibility to end consumers to check the ...

re: Pest-Stop helps blitz bed bugs

Pest-Stop
Hi Ely,The active ingredient is permethrin and is a fumite type product in which the fuse is lit for the product to work in the target area....

re: Pest-Stop helps blitz bed bugs

Ely
What is the active ingredient in the fumer? Is it a water-based or do I need to ignite it? thanks...

re: Which? says B&Q website is bottom of the pile

Roger
I agree that b&q have got it badly wrong on their new website.whoever programmed it should be sacked. For a start, the menu button does not ...

re: Ideabright Ltd bought back in pre-pack deal

Danny
When are we ever going to learn that these types of businesses, are nothing more than what the authorities would under any other ...

Most read stories