Essential reading for retailers and suppliers in the home improvement market

VictoriaPlum.com wins trademark infringement case against competitor

Published: 18 November 2016 - Jenny Wonnacott

Online retailer VictoriaPlum.com has succeeded in legal proceedings against competitor Victorian Plumbing for infringement of trademark in a ruling from the High Court released today.

The high court in London heard how Victoria Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when customers had typed in Victoria Plum
The high court in London heard how Victoria Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when customers had typed in Victoria Plum

Victorian Plumbing paid to advertise in search engine results when consumers had searched for the Victoria Plum brand name and related terms. The court ruled that Victorian Plumbing was spending “hundreds of thousands of pounds per annum” on adverts that have been found liable for trademark infringement.

VictoriaPlum.com, which started trading in 2001, says it will now seek damages from Victorian Plumbing for the losses caused by the unlawful infringements. During the hearing the court heard from VictoriaPlum.com founder Jason Walker and Mark Radcliffe, managing director of Victorian Plumbing. VictoriaPlum.com’s case was supported by expert evidence from a leading industry expert. The week long court hearing took place at the High Court in London in October this year.

VictoriaPlum.com's chief executive officer Paul McClenaghan welcomed the ruling, saying, “We know our potential customers are over 20 times more likely to know the VictoriaPlum.com brand than that of Victorian Plumbing. The court found that Victorian Plumbing acted unlawfully, infringed our trademarks and was increasing and exacerbating confusion for customers.

"We were left with no option but to take legal action against Victorian Plumbing to protect our customers and we are pleased that our concerns have been vindicated.  We will now seek substantial damages from Victorian Plumbing through continued legal action.”

Comments


(Your email address will not be published)
Already Registered?
Sign In
Not Yet Registered?
Register
Printable View E-mail Bookmark

What do you think?


Retailers: what are your thoughts on Smart Home Technology?


Latest reader comments

re: UPDATE: Social housing B&Q vouchers leaving DIY SMEs out in the cold

Anne Duffy
I got an £85 b&q decoration card was told got on the 6th March & they said it was used on the 8th which would be hard as I went to use it ...

re: Homebase scraps Spend & Save loyalty scheme

Gel
Homebase have also abandoned the "Click + Collect" service they offered until recently. A useful facility that has been removed by the new ...

re: John Lewis profits plummets by more than 50%

Paul
Not surprised by this. My small experaince with them was lots of staff walking around in 2 or 3's chatting not offering to help. When ...

re: STIHL to showcase cordless garden tool range at Glee

Gel
I wonder if this means that their previous lock down on Stihl dealers selling outside their area is now gone, or just on these Li Ion ...

re: Homebase scraps Spend & Save loyalty scheme

Jeff
I have an expired Homebase card. Have they stopped issuing new ones or renewing old ones? If so has it been replaced by Nectar card...

Most read stories