Essential reading for retailers and suppliers in the home improvement market

Is the industry ready for the light bulb ban?

Published: 25 August 2009
News of the impending ban on opaque incandescent light bulbs has been rife but have you got your facts right and how do you plan to adapt your range?
Is the industry ready for the light bulb ban?
In accordance with the EU ban, from September 1, opaque incandescent light bulbs can no longer be manufactured or imported into the UK.

Any bulbs already in stock or stored in warehousing in the EU after this date can continue to be sold, as they are already deemed to have been 'placed on the market' before the regulation deadline.

A number of leading retailers opted for a voluntary ban in January this year and ceased stocking 100-watt and 75-watt incandescent bulbs. Panic buying ensued from consumers who were unwilling to give up the traditional bulb and embrace the replacement compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs).

Similar scenes have been reported in Germany, where people are so sceptical about the new low energy lamps that they have been stockpiling incandescent bulbs. In fact, sales of the traditional lamps rose 34% in the first half of 2009.

Larger retailers appear to have taken the lead, with B&Q announcing that it is to double its range of low energy lighting from September 14 in response to the EU's ban on opaque incandescent bulbs.

The DIY chain's extended One Planet Home range will include a dimmable energy efficient bulb and is part of the company's commitment to phasing out traditional incandescent light bulbs by 2011.

According to recent figures, low energy light bulbs are reported to use 80% less energy than a traditional bulb, saving homeowners as much as £37 a year.

The next incandescent model to be phased out as part of the Government's proposed timetable will be the 60-watt A-shaped bulb. Participating retailers are asked to stop selling these bulbs by January 2010.

Further information is available from The Lighting Association, Dencon and the BHF Group.

Comments

Published prior to March 2014
By Rod Munch
I agree with Harry.

I also agree that this is a very informative Article

Regards
Rod

http://www.firstlightdirect.com
Published prior to March 2014
By Halogenica
According to what recent figures? Even the European Commission now admits that CFLs don't give 80% (possibly after some of us have pointed this out to them).

A recent test by The Telegraph found sampled CFLs to give a mean of only 58% of the equivalent incandescent.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/6110547/Energy-saving-light-bulbs-offer-dim-future.html

CFLs also use more energy than shows on the electricity bill due to poor power factor, lose even more output with age, and often don't last as long as promised (depending on quality of bulb and how you use it).

On top of this we have the mercury content, the poor colour rendering, the widely varying light quality, the poor fit in many luminaires, the temperature sensitivity and only some extra expensive CFLs being dimmable. Not exactly a decent replacement.
Published prior to March 2014
By Brian Dancer
I really do love these bulbs, as they never burn out (at least for me) and have saved me a ton of money on my energy bills. Give incentives to switch, not commands.
Published prior to March 2014
By Steve
Current model compact fluorescents are cheap, fast to warm up, long lasting and truly low energy. Why so grumpy?

http://www.energysavingtrust.org.uk/Energy-saving-products/Energy-saving-lightbulbs-and-fittings
Published prior to March 2014
By Juliet
I have read somewhere that to make these hideous looking energy saving monstrocities, damages the environment more than the manufacture of normal bulbs. Is this correct ?
Published prior to March 2014
By harry
Incandescent bulbs glow even in less voltage than its prescribed voltage, but coming to CFLs, they won"t. I opine EU must rethink once again on this aspect. Thanks for sharing.

Regards
harry
http://www.lyco.co.uk/
Published prior to March 2014
By Rod
[quote]Typo error
Can not be produced or imported into the Uk after September 2010 NOT January 2010[/quote]

Pearl bulbs Sept 2009.....Clear bulbs Sept 2010
Published prior to March 2014
By Lighthouse
The phased out lamps will still be available from smaller retailers.
I have a retail shop & have stock pilled 10K of lamps & will continue to sell, although all importers & manufacturers have already price increased these lamps by up to 300%, in a recession they obviously see an gap to make excessive extra money, not stupid are they.
Published prior to March 2014
By Ray Delamare
The WEEE directive added a tax to every flourescent lamp sold from July 2004 I think. This was to fund the safe and effective disposal of these lamps. This has not happened, most are being sent to landfill, with the money going elswhere. If this wasn't the government doing this it would be called fraud - or is it? But is an environmental mess...the usual government cock-up of an otherwise good idea. By the way, what are the poeple who get migranes and have skin conditions meant to do? They can't use these lamps!
Published prior to March 2014
By lighthouse10
This ban makes no sense - from any perspective

Europeans and Americans choose to buy ordinary light bulbs around 9 times out of 10 (light industry data 2007-8)

Banning what people want gives the supposed savings - no point in banning an impopular product!

If new LED lights -or improved CFLs- are good,
people will buy them - no need to ban ordinary light bulbs (little point).
If they are not good, people will not buy them - no need to ban ordinary light bulbs (no point).
The arrival of the transistor didn't mean that more energy using radio valves were banned... they were bought less anyway.



Light bulbs have been safely used for 100+ years
We are not talking about lead paint here,
and light bulbs do not give out CO2 gas (like cars)...

= power stations give out the emissions, power stations can of course be dealt with directly
(CO2 processing and/or energy substitution, as is already planned anyway).

Ironically the environmentally questionable CFL lights are the one being promoted - in another world, those mercury containing bulbs would be the ones banned!

For all reasons why banning bulbs is wrong,
and why the energy emission savings arguments don't hold up,
- and for the EU and industrial background politics behind the ban
see http://www.ceolas.net/#li1x onwards

(if banning was nonetheless desired, governments could gain (or could have gained) a lot of income from a tax that nevertheless reducedthe sales on the cheap popular bulbs which could be used towards home energy schemes and renewable projects, lowering emissions much more than remaining bulbs were causing them = in the UK for example, a pound or two on reduced c.250-300 million annual sales would give substantial sums)

Published prior to March 2014
By c ryley
what will they try to ban next
Published prior to March 2014
By MICK LEWANDOWSKI
Typo error
Can not be produced or imported into the Uk after September 2010 NOT January 2010
Published prior to March 2014
By GJ
Can anyone tell me where I can get dimmable low energy BC candle bulbs from?
Published prior to March 2014
By ASL
Has this world gone mad...do the people in power have to meddle and control every part of our lives even down to the damn light bulbs I buy ?
I still intend to use them for as long as I can, Im sure i'll be able to get them under the counter and probably have to pay 3 times as much for them so dont anyone try to tell me how much money i'll be saving.
Published prior to March 2014
By Neil
I ve heard reports that the so called low energy light bulbs are not so energy efficient when first switched on, as a result within the first hour of operation they use more electricity than an equivalent standard light bulb. Therefore people using energy saving light bulbs for short term use are actually increasing their energy bills. Moreover when factoring in the initial cost of the energy saving bulb the cost to the consumer increases further.

Can anyone confirm or deny if such reports have any substance?
Published prior to March 2014
By Coles
We have experienced this too, the main complaint is that the low energy bulbs *are/were expensive,
*don't last any longer than incandescents,
*don't give out enough light,
*take too long to warm up
*have harmful chemicals in which can't easily be disposed of.

Certainly the low energy light bulbs are not seen as an effective replacement and therein lies the problem.
Published prior to March 2014
By MICK LEWANDOWSKI
These can not be produced or imported into the Uk after September 2010 NOT January 0201
Published prior to March 2014
By ian
just tell the eu to butt out of our affairs we didnt vote them in and they are just a bloody nuisance
that costs all of us a fortune for no advantage at all

(Your email address will not be published)
4 + 2 =  
Already Registered?
Sign In
Not Yet Registered?
Register
Printable View E-mail Bookmark
*

Latest reader comments

re: Latest update on Green Homes Grant and implications for homeowners and landlords

John Hart
After applying for a green homes how long will it take for a decision? thanks...

re: SX Rainproof Exterior Caulk

Wally
I need the exterior sx rain resistant caulk! Can't get it anywhere so please help! How can I order it? Need it yesterday...

re: BCT can replicate any material in a ceramic tile

Christina Tiritanou
Not sure if you can help as I require a tile which has the measurements of 6”x 6”? Thank you....

re: Latest update on Green Homes Grant and implications for homeowners and landlords

colin thompson
SarahVery clear and helpful information.Thanks...

Most read stories